Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - closed for nominations

  1. #1
    jyim's Avatar
    jyim is offline Sugar Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Posts
    943

    Default Sugar 5.5.2 patch - closed for nominations

    Sugar 5.5.2 patch is now open for nominations.

    I'm happy to announce that the Sugar 5.5 maintenance patches are back and will follow a 5.5.x naming convention.

    Please nominate bugs you would like to see addressed in this patch by posting the bug number in this forum thread.

    The list of bugs and requests targeted to be addressed in the patch will be available shortly. I will update this thread when they can be viewed in the Bug Tracker.

    As of the writing of this post, the patch is targeted for a late April delivery.

    NOTE: Bugs can be moved out of this release at any time.
    Last edited by jyim; 2010-03-17 at 06:57 PM. Reason: formatting

    Jennifer Yim
    Senior Product Manager
    SUGARCRM Inc.
    Home: http://www.sugarcrm.com | Live Demo: http://www.sugarcrm.com/sugarcrm

  2. #2
    conanth is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Release Community Edition Ver 5.5.1

    When importing Accounts the "Assigned To" field defaults to currently logged in user and not the value that is in the import CSV file.

    When importing Contacts the "Account Name" field does not get linked to the actual Account record already in the database even though the name in the import CSV file is identical to the already stored Account name.

    All the above were working correctly in version 5.5.0

    Submited Bug Number 36326

  3. #3
    silverstone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Bug #33918

    Q: What's large a campaign without automatic feedback of bounces?
    A: Lot of manual work, that can cause mistakes made by humans.

    But seriously, I'd love to see the recognition of bounces a more sophisticated way.

  4. #4
    jnassi's Avatar
    jnassi is offline Sugar Team Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    455

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Quote Originally Posted by conanth View Post
    Release Community Edition Ver 5.5.1

    When importing Accounts the "Assigned To" field defaults to currently logged in user and not the value that is in the import CSV file.

    When importing Contacts the "Account Name" field does not get linked to the actual Account record already in the database even though the name in the import CSV file is identical to the already stored Account name.

    All the above were working correctly in version 5.5.0

    Submited Bug Number 36326
    We're investigating this for our 5.5.2 maintenance release, targeted for May.
    Jason Nassi
    SugarExchange.com

  5. #5
    jnassi's Avatar
    jnassi is offline Sugar Team Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    455

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Quote Originally Posted by silverstone View Post
    Bug #33918

    Q: What's large a campaign without automatic feedback of bounces?
    A: Lot of manual work, that can cause mistakes made by humans.

    But seriously, I'd love to see the recognition of bounces a more sophisticated way.
    We're investigating this for our 6.1 release.
    Jason Nassi
    SugarExchange.com

  6. #6
    conanth is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    16

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Bug Number: 36700
    Subject: Import Activity Calls relate to leads

    When importing Activities/Calls, when "Relate To" Leads is selected, the import does not relate the imported name to existing lead.

    This has not worked since 5.5.0

    Interestingly, "Relate To" leads works when importing Meets or To-Dos.

  7. #7
    ManifestInform is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Old Bug 19659 Email Signatures
    Still broken in v 5.2.0 build 587
    Cannot edit email signature as no buttons appear until after a second signature is added. Tested in multiple browsers.
    Bug was also said to have been fixed in 2261.

  8. #8
    silverstone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    Campaign emails have no embedded images anymore 5.5.1
    Well, why not work on this? You can embed images in an email that is sent to one particular recipient, but not within a campaign. It appears in your editor, but is not sent out; receiver doesn't get embedded image.

  9. #9
    sugarFLO is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    45

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    #36729

    SugarCRM can't handle non-English characters in (text-only) emails.
    This makes it currently unusable for internatioal customers.

  10. #10
    datasponge is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Jose, CA, USA
    Posts
    553

    Default Re: Sugar 5.5.2 patch - open for nominations

    I noticed 36196 has not been assigned yet.

    I would think a module loader uninstall trying to remove the entire file system would be a good one to fix.

    Phil

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sugar 5.2.0 Del Mar (Patch K) (closed for nominations)
    By matthew in forum Patch Nominations
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2010-10-13, 05:38 PM
  2. Sugar 5.5.3 maintenance release - CLOSED for nominations
    By jnassi in forum Patch Nominations
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 2010-06-10, 10:44 PM
  3. Sugar 5.2.0 Huntington (Patch J) (closed)
    By matthew in forum Patch Nominations
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 2009-09-17, 05:25 PM
  4. Sugar 5.2.0 Hermosa (Patch F) - closed for nominations
    By jyim in forum Patch Nominations
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 2009-07-16, 03:28 PM
  5. Sugar 5.2.0 Redondo (Patch G) - closed for nominations
    By jyim in forum Patch Nominations
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 2009-07-09, 06:35 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •