Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Any versions with Stored Procedures?

  1. #1
    D_M_S is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    64

    Default Any versions with Stored Procedures?

    I realize that Sugar does not use stored procedures and this gives some flexibility in choosing the backend database.

    But has anyone tried to produce a version of Sugar that uses SPs for MySQL? Surely someone out there has been interested in doing this. My guess is that it exists in a "private" install since it would be difficult to do as a module or a single script. But in case I'm wrong, I'd like to know if there is a version out there that uses stored procedures.

  2. #2
    salesagility's Avatar
    salesagility is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,379

    Default Re: Any versions with Stored Procedures?

    Never been a fan of stored procedures ... loosely coupled architectures are compromised by SP ... IMHO SP's are a way for proprietary vendors to tie in customers.

  3. #3
    D_M_S is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    64

    Default Re: Any versions with Stored Procedures?

    WHAAAA????

    There's a performance gain to be had with stored procedures . . . that's why they exist.

  4. #4
    salesagility's Avatar
    salesagility is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,379

    Default Re: Any versions with Stored Procedures?

    I personally like to keep the database access to storage and retrieval and move most of the business logic out of the database into a middle tier. Medium and long term benefits accrue. There may be some short term benefits from SPs but that's what they are ... short term gain for long term pain.

  5. #5
    D_M_S is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    64

    Default Re: Any versions with Stored Procedures?

    Indeed, it may not be ideal for the long term. But then again . . . what's the long term? It's fun to play around with Sugar and do a fresh install, but in the practical world, I don't think companies prefer to update their business-critical CRM on a continual basis. If I have a stable CRM with no compelling reason to upgrade for, say, 2 years, then the work (and benefits) of SPs might very well be worth it.

    Again, I'd be highly surprised if a client out there has not already attempted this. Surely someone out there is leveraging stored procedures.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Store Procedures Sugar SQL Server
    By rdesanctis in forum Español
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-06-26, 11:38 PM
  2. Stored procedures in Zucker Reports
    By enrikm in forum Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2008-04-29, 10:23 AM
  3. Calling stored procedures
    By mswaim1 in forum Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-04-07, 07:38 PM
  4. PHP versions
    By marketadvantage in forum Developer Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-03-05, 10:07 PM
  5. Implementing your procedures - Your feedback needed!
    By k123 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2007-10-11, 11:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •