Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: SugarCRM disabling users while keeping them "active"

  1. 2009-12-03, 10:05 PM #1
    wdroush
    wdroush is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    159

    Default SugarCRM disabling users while keeping them "active"

    Well awhile ago when employees left I would disable their accounts, this would make them impossible to search for though in the database, so their leads needed to be transfered out first... we couldn't wait a few days...

    After that I just started changing passwords, but this sucks too, why? Because I say so (ok I just don't like this method).

    3rd idea, and the one I have a question about, why not create a user role that is denied to everything... would this cause any security issues?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 2009-12-04, 12:24 AM #2
    Angel's Avatar
    Angel
    Angel is offline Sugar Community Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,813

    Default Re: SugarCRM disabling users while keeping them "active"

    Why not create a role that doesn't allow a user access to anything and then simply add the user to that role?
    Regards,

    Angel Magaņa
    Co-Author: Implementing SugarCRM 5.x (Packt Publishing -- Sept. 2010)
    Blog: http://cheleguanaco.blogspot.com.
    Twitter: @cheleguanaco.

    ________
    | Projects: |_____________________________________
    |
    | CandyWrapper (.NET Wrapper for SugarCRM SOAP API). Source now available on GitHub!
    | GoldMine to SugarCRM Express Conversion. Latest: 1.0.1.7 (Nov. 3, 2009)
    | CRM SkyDialer (Skype Integration). Latest: 1.0.2 (Feb. 17, 2010)
    | Round Robin Leads Assignment
    | Phone Number Formatter
    | CaseTwit (Twitter Integration)
    ______________________________________________
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 2009-12-28, 09:20 PM #3
    wdroush
    wdroush is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: SugarCRM disabling users while keeping them "active"

    Quote Originally Posted by Angel View Post
    Why not create a role that doesn't allow a user access to anything and then simply add the user to that role?
    Yeah that was the 3rd idea, I just wanted to make sure you couldn't access anything and there were no loopholes or issues with that idea.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Keeping a language to "fill" the lacks of another language pack
    By arnaud3344 in forum Translators
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2009-02-17, 03:15 PM
  2. Bad juju when disabling "save search and layout"
    By dogfuel2 in forum Developer Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2009-02-17, 03:42 AM
  3. disabling "record new call?" option in calls popup?
    By netron in forum Developer Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-01-31, 02:49 PM
  4. Keeping contacts "private"
    By alamba in forum Help
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2006-03-08, 09:53 AM
  5. Sugar Scheduler: Monitor Inbox: Subpanel "Active jobs"
    By wp.rauchholz in forum Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2006-01-11, 12:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules