Lost another one to ......

[michaelper22]

After doing a little bit of browsing online, I managed to find out about ...... CRM, which just happens to be based on Sugar OS Edition. I was initially impressed by its enhanced features, but now after playing around with it, I find it still doesn't give me everything. But ...... has enough to convert me from Sugar to it. Sorry to the Sugar team for leaving you, but competition is strong.
......'s web site: http://www........com/
Edit: And now this post is full of censored names? Unbelievable.

[ryansa]

i am agree with you

[michaelper22]

Just seeing a compeitors product name being censored is driving me away from Sugar. Last I looked there are no rules regarding mentioning those things, so why shoukd it be censored? There has to be a relatively high level of freedom of speech, and businees practices such as this do not find favor from me.

[chrisky]

Am I correct in understanding that you posted a website link (of a competing CRM product) of which was removed from your post?

I seriously hope this isn't the case, and if so, the Sugar Team scratches this policy real quick and without the need for further complaints form such..

I personally have no respect for such type of practices, and despite what Sugar or anyone may think, stunts like this will not result in keeping someone from trying or seeking out a competing product.. Even the most incompetant is capable of punching a few words into Google or Yahoo and clicking on search..

It is intentional, malfeasent, unscrupulous, and similar acts such as this that will cause users such as myself and others, to go from supporting and defending the Sugar Team to ............................

[malcolmh]

I assume you guys are referring to vt1ger? vt1ger took the complete Sugar code base from I think version 1.5 and reused it for their own needs. I have also been told by a developer, that they keep taking code snippets from both the OS and PRO version.

If someone kept taking things from you with no recognition, wouldn't you also be pis... off?

On the other hand I don't really think Sugar has anything to worry about with vt1ger. In my opinion they have gone the wrong way with version 5

[longreach]

Nor do I think that Sugar has anything to worry about from this former fork of 1.5 - but I do think it makes Sugar look small to adopt this practice, and also feel that in so doing they are actually lending some validation to a not very important player in this marketplace.